<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beverly Hills Breast Augmentation Specialist Dr. Stuart Linder &#187; Breast topics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/category/breast-topics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Breast Implants, Above Vs. Below The Muscle</title>
		<link>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/08/breast-implants-above-vs-below-the-muscle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/08/breast-implants-above-vs-below-the-muscle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart A. Linder, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Augmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Implants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual plane technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saline breast implants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicone implants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submuscular pocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpectoral placement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/?p=1971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saline and silicone implants can be placed either subpectoral, dual plane technique or subglandular (above the muscle).  The plane of dissection normally depends upon each individual woman’s chest wall anatomy.  For the majority of women, we do prefer to place the implants in the dual plane technique, two-thirds under and one-third over laterally.  The reason [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="saline and silicone breast implants" href="http://www.drlinder.com/psarticles-silicone.htm"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1976" title="breast implant placement" src="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/breast-implant-placement.jpg" alt="breast implant placement" width="250" height="200" />Saline and silicone implants</a> can be placed either subpectoral, dual plane technique or subglandular (above the muscle).  The plane of dissection normally depends upon each individual woman’s chest wall anatomy.  For the majority of women, we do prefer to place the implants in the dual plane technique, two-thirds under and one-third over laterally.  The reason for two-thirds is the lateral third of the pectoralis muscle is the oblique orientation and there is no true muscle cover on the lateral portion of the breast.  We do not use the serratus anterior muscle in cosmetic surgery normally in order to place the implant in the complete submuscular pocket.  Therefore, the majority of my patients undergo dual plane technique which is considered “under the muscle.”  Women who are thin (ectomorphic) and minimal body tissue should have submuscular cover to reduce visibility and palpability of the implant edge.  Indications for subglandular or above the muscle are women who have very thick chest walls, endomorphic appearance, barrel chest deformity, and women who have very thick amounts of breast tissue and/or muscle.  If you put the implants submuscular in these women, they have a very flattened appearance to the implants and they are often very unhappy with the final appearance.  They lack the fullness of the upper pole of the breast and often will want <a title="breast revision surgery" href="http://www.breastrevisionsurgeon.com">revision surgery</a>.  After having placed thousands and thousands of implants, I have been able to obviously determine which patients do well with implants above the muscle.  Those are often thick chested women who do possess upper pole fullness and therefore an implant should be placed above the muscle in order to prevent effacement of the upper pectoralis major on the upper pole of the <a title="breast implant placement las vegas" href="http://www.breastimplantlasvegas.com/implant-placement.asp">breast implant</a>.  When implants are placed above the muscle on revision often I will maintain the same pocket in dissection.  Sometimes the capsule can be used in order to create more coverage and sometimes the neo plane can be developed by elevating a small portion of the medial muscle lifting it and suturing it to the lower capsule; however, this not always possible.</p>
<p>In summary, implant position placement submuscular versus subglandular depends upon each individual woman’s anatomy, amount of breast tissue and also preference of the final appearance of the breast.  In general, in thinner women, a more natural appearance is accomplished by placing the implant using the dual plane technique or submuscular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/08/breast-implants-above-vs-below-the-muscle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International Society Aesthetic Plastic Surgery</title>
		<link>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/08/international-society-aesthetic-plastic-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/08/international-society-aesthetic-plastic-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart A. Linder, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Augmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aesthetic reconstructive surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international plastic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISAPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/?p=1951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY  20th CONGRESS
AUGUST 14 TO 18, 2010
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
The annual meeting of ISAPS 2010 in San Francisco here at the Moscone Convention Center has been an informative and educational experience.  This has been an exciting meeting with beautiful weather and fine dining.  Topics have included AP issues in plastic surgery as well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY  20th CONGRESS<br />
AUGUST 14 TO 18, 2010<br />
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1952" src="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/isaps-cert.-photo-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" />The annual meeting of ISAPS 2010 in San Francisco here at the Moscone Convention Center has been an informative and educational experience.  This has been an exciting meeting with beautiful weather and fine dining.  Topics have included AP issues in <a title="plastic surgery" href="http://www.drlinder.com">plastic surgery</a> as well as multiple sessions.  Session one was specifically regarding Periocular Rejuvenation, describing both cosmetic and reconstructive surgery of the periorbital region.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1953" src="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/linder-letter-from-sf-photo-223x300.jpg" alt="" width="223" height="300" /></p>
<p>Session two is specific to Facial Rejuvenation.  Section Three, Rhinoplasty, with Nasal Reconstruction.  Fourth session is corresponding to Aesthetic <a title="breast surgery " href="http://www.breastimplantlasvegas.com">Breast Surgery</a> which was fascinating; and Session Five was associated with Aesthetic Reconstructive Surgery.  This is an International Society Meeting with doctors from throughout the globe, extending from countries, including Columbia, Switzerland, London, Paris, Australia, Spain and China.  Once again, this is an excellent meeting with both educational and informative objectiveness.  Please see letter from Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger specific to attendees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/08/international-society-aesthetic-plastic-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ultimate Scar Cream, Kelo-Cote</title>
		<link>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/07/ultimate-scar-cream-kelo-cote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/07/ultimate-scar-cream-kelo-cote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart A. Linder, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Body Sculpting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Asymmetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Augmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Implants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tummy Tuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast lift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kelo-cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keloiding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/?p=1863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KELO-COTE INFOMERCIAL
Because Dr. Linder performs so many surgeries where scarring is such a significant part of his procedures, including mastopexies, breast lifts, abdominoplasties and breast augmentations, reducing the scarring is absolutely a main necessity.  The best product that we have used, certainly in the last decade, has been Kelo-cote or Bio Corneum.  Kelo-cote is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KELO-COTE INFOMERCIAL</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1865" title="KeloCote" src="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/KeloCote.jpg" alt="KeloCote" width="200" height="70" />Because Dr. Linder performs so many surgeries where scarring is such a significant part of his procedures, including mastopexies, <a title="breast lifts, mastopexies" href="http://www.drlinder.com">breast lifts</a>, abdominoplasties and <a title="breast augmentation las vegas" href="http://www.breastimplantlasvegas.com/">breast augmentations</a>, reducing the scarring is absolutely a main necessity.  The best product that we have used, certainly in the last decade, has been Kelo-cote or Bio Corneum.  Kelo-cote is a silicone gel spray which is used twice a day after sutures are removed, usually on day 14 to day 21, for at least three months.  The silicone gel spray greatly reduces the redness as well as hypertrophic keloiding of the scars and has smoothed out scars beautifully over the last two years. </p>
<p>Look out for the next one and two-minute infomercials from Kelo-cote where Dr. Linder has been used as a scar expert for Advanced Bio Technology.  Because we believe so wholeheartedly in the use of Kelo-cote, giving worldwide testimonial as to the benefits of Kelo-cote, goes without reservation.  We look forward to seeing the Kelo-cote used worldwide and on television sets throughout the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/07/ultimate-scar-cream-kelo-cote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Launching Of New Website, Breast Implant Las Vegas.com</title>
		<link>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/04/launching-of-new-website-breast-implant-las-vegas-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/04/launching-of-new-website-breast-implant-las-vegas-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart A. Linder, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Augmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Implants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/?p=1542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breastimplantlasvegas.com will be launched in the very near future.  This site has been developed in order to educate patients with breast augmentation surgery in general.  We go through all the specifics and facts of breast augmentation surgery, including the history of breast augmentation, the chemical composition of silicone itself, the postoperative care and management of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1549" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 486px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1549   " title="Masthead" src="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Masthead.jpg" alt="Masthead" width="476" height="112" /><p class="wp-caption-text">breastimplantlasvegas.com</p></div>
<p>Breastimplantlasvegas.com will be launched in the very near future.  This site has been developed in order to educate patients with breast augmentation surgery in general.  We go through all the specifics and facts of breast augmentation surgery, including the history of breast augmentation, the chemical composition of silicone itself, the postoperative care and management of breast augmented patients, identification cards from your breast implant surgery, as well as postoperative recovery time.</p>
<p>With respect to saline implants, great detail is given as to the surgical technique and candidates for saline versus silicone gel implants.  With silicone implants themselves, the 7-year complication rate for primary versus secondary augmentation patients is given, courtesy of Natrelle Collections.  Placement of implants as well as implant shapes, including high profile moderate plus and moderate profile implants, are described in detail, including examples of before and after photographs.  Breast deformities are also described, including breast asymmetry, tubular breast deformity, pectus carinatum and pectus excavatum.  Photograph examples are also given. </p>
<p>Finally, breast implant revision, which is a large component of <a title="beverly hills breast surgeon" href="http://www.drlinder.com">Dr. Linder’s practice</a>, is described with respect to breast asymmetry, capsular contracture, ruptured implants, double-bubble breast deformity, cleavage, both primary as well as revision, implant malposition, severe bottoming out, volume revisions, anatomically shaped implants, symmastia, implant explantation and scarring on the breast mound itself.  You may also refer to <a title="breast revision surgeon" href="http://www.breastrevisionsurgeon.com">breastrevisionsurgeon.com</a> and <a title="las vegas breast revision " href="http://www.lasvegasbreastrevision.com">lasvegasbreastrevision.com </a> for more details on breast revision surgery.</p>
<p>Again, the main purpose of this site is to become an encyclopedia of wealth of information to educate women throughout the world, as well as Beverly Hills and Las Vegas, Nevada on breast augmentation and breast revision surgery itself.  I hope you find this very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/04/launching-of-new-website-breast-implant-las-vegas-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLEAVAGE REPAIR STATUS POST BREAST AUGMENTATION – BEVERLY HILLS</title>
		<link>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/04/cleavage-repair-status-post-breast-augmentation-%e2%80%93-beverly-hills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/04/cleavage-repair-status-post-breast-augmentation-%e2%80%93-beverly-hills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart A. Linder, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Augmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Implants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic Surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/?p=1526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patients present to my office weekly for breast revision surgery.  Cleavage is an important determinant and final result after breast augmentation procedures.  The  patient in the photos underwent augmentation mammoplasty procedure by a different surgeon with obviously poor cleavage.  This was done through the transaxillary approach in which the parasternal attachments of the pectoralis major muscle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1530" style="margin: 3px 7px; border: black 3px solid;" title="cleavage repair Beverly Hills" src="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cleavage-repair-Beverly-Hills1-215x300.jpg" alt="cleavage repair Beverly Hills" width="215" height="300" />Patients present to my office weekly for breast revision surgery.  Cleavage is an important determinant and final result after breast augmentation procedures.  The  patient in the photos underwent augmentation mammoplasty procedure by a different surgeon with obviously poor cleavage.  This was done through the transaxillary approach in which the parasternal attachments of the pectoralis major muscle were inadequately released.  We see this very frequently with patients having poor to no cleavage and having laterally displaced implants due to inadequate release of the muscle attachments along the medial parasternal ridge from the pectoralis major muscle.  In order to repair this patient’s breasts and give her a reasonable amount of cleavage, the periareolar approach was performed.  The implants were removed and medial open capsulotomy and inferior capsulectomy were performed with a moderate plus silicone gel implant placed and very tight compression sports bra for six weeks postoperatively allowed, as you can see on the postop photo improved cleavage with medial Vectra forcing of the implants to the midline.  Notice, there wasn’t a significant change in size of the implant, rather the pocket was released appropriately, implants were then brought to the midline and compression allowed for stabilization along the implants towards the sternal region.  Cleavage is an important determination of final outcome of <a title="Beverly Hills Breast Augmentation" href="http://www.drlinder.com/bevhillsbreastaug.html" target="_self">breast augmentation </a>surgery.  As a result, the approach that we take, periareolar and dual plane technique, allows for safe and <a title="Breast Augmentation Photos" href="http://www.drlinder.com/PHOTOList.asp?photo=Breast+Augmentation&amp;c=752">predictable results</a>, including final cleavage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2010/04/cleavage-repair-status-post-breast-augmentation-%e2%80%93-beverly-hills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BREAST BIOPSIES, EVEN WITH NEGATIVE DIAGNOSTIC TESTING</title>
		<link>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2009/11/breast-biopsies-even-with-negative-diagnostic-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2009/11/breast-biopsies-even-with-negative-diagnostic-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart A. Linder, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast biopsies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capsulectomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my practice, I believe that all breast masses have to be considered very seriously, especially breast masses that are enlarging over a short period of time.  As a case example, recently we saw a patient who had an unremarkable ultrasound showing no evidence of malignancy, no microcalcifications and no indication per radiology for any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my practice, I believe that all breast masses have to be considered very seriously, especially breast masses that are enlarging over a short period of time.  As a case example, recently we saw a patient who had an unremarkable ultrasound showing no evidence of malignancy, no microcalcifications and no indication per radiology for any type of diagnostic testing of the mass itself. </p>
<div id="attachment_1010" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/linder-bio-photo1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1010" title="linder bio photo" src="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/linder-bio-photo1-300x200.jpg" alt="model" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">model</p></div>
<p>The patient was to undergo a removal and replacement of <a title="breast implant revision" href="http://www.breastrevisionsurgeon.com">implants</a> that were over a decade old, but she had a mass that was approximately 3&#215;5 cm and it was well loculated in the right upper breast.  Even though the ultrasound was normal or negative, did not show any evidence of malignancy, I believed that this should be biopsied intraoperatively with removal and replacement of the implants.  In the operating room, bilateral removal and <a title="breast surgeon beverly hills" href="http://www.drlinder.com">replacement of implants</a>, open capsulectomy and excisional biopsy of the right breast mass was performed.  The mass was hard, somewhat calcified and very thick.  It was sent to our excellent pathologist at the UCLA Medical Center for diagnostic purposes.  The diagnosis came back ductal carcinoma, which was invasive.  Thank God we took the initiative to do a biopsy at this time even in the face of a false negative report on her ultrasound where she was asked to repeat the ultrasound in six months to one year.  Who knows what the state of this patient would be in six months to one year.  There is a chance that she may not be alive in six months to one year. </p>
<p>As a result, I believe in my practice all tumors, especially tumors or breast lesions that are enlarging rapidly over a short period of time, should be considered seriously biopsied either with fine needle aspiration, TruKor, or excisional biopsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2009/11/breast-biopsies-even-with-negative-diagnostic-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY BEVERLY HILLS</title>
		<link>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2009/11/screening-mammography-beverly-hills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2009/11/screening-mammography-beverly-hills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart A. Linder, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening mammography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHAT’S THE CONTROVERSY
Recently, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has changed the screening mammography for women in the United States to 50 years of age.  I believe this is a very controversial subject and topic and there are pros and cons certainly on both sides of the issue.  However, as a Board Certified Plastic and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT’S THE CONTROVERSY</p>
<p>Recently, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has changed the screening mammography for women in the United States to 50 years of age.  I believe this is a very controversial subject and topic and there are pros and cons certainly on both sides of the issue.  However, as a Board Certified <a title="beverly Hills Plastic Surgeon" href="http://www.drlinder.com/">Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon</a>,  a Diplomate of the American Board of Plastic Surgery, a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons and as a specialist in breast surgery, including breast augmentation, <a title="breast revision specialist" href="http://www.breastrevisionsurgeon.com">breast revision</a>, breast lifts and <a title="beverly hills breast reduction" href="http://www.breastreductionspecialist.com">breast reduction </a>surgery, I strongly oppose this new change for several reasons. </p>
<p>First of all, breast cancer is one of the most common forms of malignancy found in women in the United States today.  Screening mammographies in general are quite inexpensive, ranging between $80 and $150.  I believe this is a small price to pay to detect early pre-malignant or malignant cancers in younger females in their 30’s and 40’s.  </p>
<div id="attachment_997" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Mammogram.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-997   " style="margin: 0px 4px; border: black 5px solid;" title="Mammogram x ray example" src="http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Mammogram-300x219.jpg" alt="mammogram example " width="300" height="219" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mammogram X Ray Example </p></div>
<p> </p>
<p>Personally, I believe that all women at 40 years of age, regardless of family history, should have screening mammographies unequivocally.  Patients who undergo breast surgery, including implants, breast reductions and breast lifts should undergo preoperative diagnostic and screening mammographies at the age of 35.  Multiple studies have shown that mammograms at 40 years of age save lives.  Dr. Vogel has cited several lines of evidence which support the American Cancer Society’s recommendation for screening mammographies for women between the age of 40 and 49, including evidence of early detection of breast cancer and how it does save lives as seen in the Journal of American Medicine in the 1995 issue.  Certainly, increasing screening mammographies to 50 years of age will save billions of dollars a year, but at what price?  Unquestionably, cancers will be undetected in women in their 30’s and 40’s with an increased risk of metastasis and certainly an increased risk of mortality.  In fact, in my practice we have performed breast reconstruction operations for bilateral mastectomy patients in their late 20’s and early 30’s.  If these patients had not had mammographies they would certainly be dead.  Therefore, for the above reasons, I will continue to recommend mammograms for all women at the age of 40, for any woman with a family diathesis of breast cancer at the age of 35 and for all women who undergo any type of breast surgery as well at the age of 35.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastsurgeonblog.com/2009/11/screening-mammography-beverly-hills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
